Page 1 of 1

After-quote price hikes

Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2007 9:07 pm
by Shirokuma
This is a small rant about what I subjectively believe to be "bad form" in Bartertown purchasing/trading.

If you make a statement in your trade post that your minis are xx% off retail, please do not hike the price once someone sends you a PM indicating interest. Take the time to make sure your post reflects what you really want or need for the item you are trading. Price hikes during trade negotiation after a price or percentage has been posted (ie: quoted) is "bad form".

If you've made a mistake in a posting, and you receive a PM indicating interest in the item (such as a reasonable offer based on the info in your post), edit the post, then inform the interested party you made a mistake, and that the post has been edited. Everyone makes errors, but trying to hike a price or value through PMs, without editing your initial post, can make a trader feel singled out for price gouging. This is "bad form".

If you receive a PM from a trader interested in your item(s), and you respond with a quote, honourable trading dictates you stick with your quote. All it takes is a little thought to ask for what you want or need in value for your item, before you make your quote. Negotiations can continue if you quote too high for the trader. Trying to raise your item(s) price or trade value after you've made a quote is "bad form". That isn't negotiation, it's price gouging. Your initial quote is the foundation of negotiation. Doing this to an interested trader could possibly make that trader feel targeted for unwarranted price/value hikes just because they showed interest.

This rant was brought about by two purchases I attempted this weekend, where prices were raised after I either made an offer based on the information in the post (minis 50% of retail), or after I was quoted a price via PM. It actually took me thinking through the entire process for it to raise my ire enough to post here.

If there are additive or dissenting opinions, or advice, I openly welcome them.

Re: After-quote price hikes

Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2007 10:37 pm
by ancientsociety
Shirokuma wrote:This is a small rant about what I subjectively believe to be "bad form" in Bartertown purchasing/trading.

If you make a statement in your trade post that your minis are xx% off retail, please do not hike the price once someone sends you a PM indicating interest. Take the time to make sure your post reflects what you really want or need for the item you are trading. Price hikes during trade negotiation after a price or percentage has been posted (ie: quoted) is "bad form".

If you've made a mistake in a posting, and you receive a PM indicating interest in the item (such as a reasonable offer based on the info in your post), edit the post, then inform the interested party you made a mistake, and that the post has been edited. Everyone makes errors, but trying to hike a price or value through PMs, without editing your initial post, can make a trader feel singled out for price gouging. This is "bad form".

If you receive a PM from a trader interested in your item(s), and you respond with a quote, honourable trading dictates you stick with your quote. All it takes is a little thought to ask for what you want or need in value for your item, before you make your quote. Negotiations can continue if you quote too high for the trader. Trying to raise your item(s) price or trade value after you've made a quote is "bad form". That isn't negotiation, it's price gouging. Your initial quote is the foundation of negotiation. Doing this to an interested trader could possibly make that trader feel targeted for unwarranted price/value hikes just because they showed interest.

This rant was brought about by two purchases I attempted this weekend, where prices were raised after I either made an offer based on the information in the post (minis 50% of retail), or after I was quoted a price via PM. It actually took me thinking through the entire process for it to raise my ire enough to post here.

If there are additive or dissenting opinions, or advice, I openly welcome them.
QFT

Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 12:37 am
by starslayer
Did he promise the item to you?
Did you actually have a "real" deal?
If not,I would disagree with you. IMHO he is free to sell the item to someone else. He is not obligated to accept your "offer".

On the other hand,if he accepted your offer he should abide by it.

Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 2:06 am
by NuWishA
Its more of someone saying they are selling for half off retail, then trying to sell it for 75% of retail when you PM them to buy it for the price they said.

Someone posts and ad that says they want half of the retail of a ten dollar item. You PM them saying you will give them the five bucks they asked for, they respond they now want $7.50.

His "offer" is what the seller set the price at. The seller could just sell to someone else, but they keep trying to jack up the price its not likely that will work too well.

Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 4:41 am
by JohnHwangBT
It depends on what you mean by a "hike". If someone says "about 30%" off, and some things are more or less, that's OK. Also, there's a usually a difference between sale value and trade value.

For example, I typically sell around 30% off, but I also trade at retail. So I might have some item's priced with a 30% discount, and other items priced only 20% off. If you want to trade, I'll revert to full retail (no discount) for both sides.

Is this unethical? I hope not.


However, if someone offers to sell for $15, and I agree, then $15 is the price. Changing things to ask for $20 later is clearly unethical, and grounds for immediate termination of the deal.

Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 4:19 pm
by starslayer
JohnHwangBT wrote:However, if someone offers to sell for $15, and I agree, then $15 is the price. Changing things to ask for $20 later is clearly unethical, and grounds for immediate termination of the deal.
I agree.

BUT.....
If you simply send an offer for $15(its not accepted) and the person states someone has offered a better price or trade,you don't have a leg to stand on IMHO. No one is obligated to sell it to you if you havent made a deal.

On the other hand....
I've had "deals" here and the person simply changed their mind. Were they forced to buy it? No.

Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 4:23 pm
by ancientsociety
starslayer wrote:
JohnHwangBT wrote:However, if someone offers to sell for $15, and I agree, then $15 is the price. Changing things to ask for $20 later is clearly unethical, and grounds for immediate termination of the deal.
I agree.
I agree as well, which is what I believe Shirokuma was trying to get @ (i.e. a trader lists a specific price in the forums but, when PM'ed, asks for more $$).

Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 10:03 pm
by Shirokuma
ancientsociety wrote:
starslayer wrote:
JohnHwangBT wrote:However, if someone offers to sell for $15, and I agree, then $15 is the price. Changing things to ask for $20 later is clearly unethical, and grounds for immediate termination of the deal.
I agree.
I agree as well, which is what I believe Shirokuma was trying to get @ (i.e. a trader lists a specific price in the forums but, when PM'ed, asks for more $$).
Yes, that was one of my points.

Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 2:18 am
by MagickalMemories
Let me TELL you what...
If I responded to a thread that had a SPECIFIC quote, and he tried to change the quote, he'd get a polite but angry (and lengthy) response from me about trade etiquette, ending in a withdrawal of my interest.
He would also make his way swiftly to my AVOID list.

That being said, if the extra was added to cover shipping costs... that is an acceptable price increase, IMO.
I may not LIKE it but, then again, when I send my inquiry for a trade I almost ALWAYS ask if the prices include shipping, if that part wasn't specifically mentioned.

Eric

Another point

Posted: Tue May 01, 2007 4:50 pm
by MokMike
The other thing I have seen is adding money after an agreed upon price to cover paypal fees. I'm sorry, but you elect to use paypal. you bear the cost. If that is an issue with you, then either raise your posted price or accept other payment means. I had an issue where I mailed a few things and just grabbed stamps off of my wife's desk. I did not realize, and the stamps did not list a monetary amount, but they were older stamps and were not full postage. I had mailed postal money orders, and was able to get them reissued. The money orders themselves cost less than a dollar.


I also had two trades where someone agreed to an offer, and sent me a PM stating ok, $xx amount, shipped, here's my email. When I replied the next day, asking if I could mail a postal money order instead, I was told they had gotten a better offer. Not sure where that stands, but I know I have also contacted a few people about possible trades, but I took to loong to find the items they were seeking (all my 40k and WHFB stuff is currently packed in boxes, either in the crawl space or garage, as my basement is now a kids playroom/paradise and dad has only a smallsmallsmall corner for his stuff).