Yeah, someof the stuff in the books and even just the models would get any movie at least a PG13 if not an R.kturock wrote: And yet no where on any of the books are there any warnings about extreme graphic art, descriptions, situations or anything.
Yes I agree. I read a lot of history and a real easy way to keep track of how many dudes you've whopped is to collect some body part. And how do you now if the guy next to you is lying well he's got the shin bones to prove it! I just mean that the warhammer realm has them kinda excessively[in my humble opinion(note I did not abbreviate that)]kturock wrote:Carrying skulls, ears, noses, skalps, teeth, fingers, claws; both human and animal; has been both a part of a right of manhood to a keeping score on personal kills. Pretty much every race has done it sometime in their history; sometimes not to distant history. [remember, yesterday is history.]
Yeah, talk about genocide.kturock wrote:You might check some of the Inca and Aztec histories for stacks of skulls. Killing each other by the 10,000 's and stacking their skulls would leave quit a pile.
That really depends on the time period. With the Greeks they might have 50,000 in one block. Now they only had one block and their tactic was to charge and slaughter. It seems like the more tactics you get the small the units would be. But then again at the battle of Banicburn between Robert the Bruce(Scotland) and Edward the second then Edward had three massive units of cavalry. They all did the same thing though. Cross the bridge, charge, die in misery. The English at that time period make me think of the Brets. But then the Brets make me think of the French. And the French make me think of, well yeah we wont go there.kturock wrote:[At a gaming convention, I played a beta of a pen and paper game back in the 80's, with the designer of a game set in that time period. Each squad was like 10,000 men. Talk about mass-battle rules and movements of blocks of men.
Benjamin